Prouve ce que tu avances et cite moi un seul passage qui montre que le prophète Mohamed (Que la paix et le satut soient sur lui) a obligé des gens a se convertir à l'Islam.
Alors ca c'est tellement facile que c'est ridicule.
Juste comme ca, a ton avis quelles sont les causes des guerres d'apostasie qui ont suivi la mort de Mohammed.
Al-Ghazali (died AH 505, that is AD 1127) who earned the title "hoggat al-Islam, meaning rock of Islam", some five centuries after the time of Mohammad, is not apologetic in stressing the use of force in the preservation and progress of Islam:
"After the death of Mohammad, the man of the miracle [the Qur'an] and the apostle of truth and the companions, fearing the weakening of Islam, the decrease of the number of its followers, and the return of masses to their previous infidelity, saw that holy war and invading other countries for the sake of Allah, smashing the faces of the infidels with the sword and making people enter the religion of Allah as the most worthy of all tasks and better than all sciences."[14]
What al-Ghazali referred to in this quotation is known as the wars of apostasy (hurub ar- Riddah) which occurred in the time of Abu Bakr when the Arabic masses rejected Islam, and had to be brought back by the sword. These wars (not one war) lasted almost two years (632-634 AD). This is a fact of history. Some modern writers want us to believe that those wars were economical and political in nature, but historians tell us otherwise. The historian Ibn Ishaq quoted 'A'isha the wife of the Prophet who said:
'when the Prophet died the Arabs rejected Islam and drank Judaism and Christianity and the Star of Nifaq'".[15]
Besides, the word riddah that describes the wars means "apostasy", and thus the wars are recognisable as being religious in origin because of this use of religious terminology. If those Arabs accepted Islam willingly, why did they reject it when the Prophet of Islam died? A contemporary writer admitted that the Arabs were forced to embrace Islam. He wrote,
"It is important to note that the inhabitants of the Arabic peninsula initially did not accept Islam willingly and sincerely. This explains the force of the apostasy (riddah) after the death of the Prophet ... the Arabs on the perimeter of the peninsula who were recent converts to Islam refused to pay the tax, some rebelled against the Islamic rule while others rejected Islam. The people of Mecca were about to reject Islam, yea they wanted to, until 'Attab Ibn Osayd threatened them ... and if it was not for Sohayl Ibn 'Amr who coerced them they would have not turned back to Islam"[16]
It is a historical fact that except for these wars, those tribes that rejected Islam would have remained non-Muslims. Were these wars an act of religious tolerance? These wars stand in history as the supreme example of religious intolerance by Islam.
http://debate.domini.org/newton/tolerance.html
Maintenant tu peux toujours traiter al Ghazali de menteur,mais ca c'est a tes propres risques.
Une excellent etude du niveau de tolerance du "saint prophete"
http://answering-islam.org.uk/Shamoun/b ... erance.htm
C'est pas un passage, mais des dizaines, sans compter un bon paquet de haddiths.
NB. C'est pas les traducteurs automatiques qui manquent sur le net. Alors pas d'excuse de ne pas comprendre l'Anglais
peut-être qu'on ne trouve pas de passages, mais on trouve des faits. (cela dit les autres religions, à certaines époques, n'ont pas fait beaucoup mieux)