John a écrit :Ok les gars, voila une autre professeur qui confirme les dires de moore et bucaille, qu'en disez vous sur lui ?
Est ce que lui aussi a eu de l'argent de l'arabie saoudite ?
Il est co-auteur... du livre avec Moore... et il était a la même conférence que les autresIl a publié une vingtaine d’ouvrages et une recherche scientifique de plus de 180 pages.
Coauteur du livre intitulé ‘le développement humain’ (5éme édition ; avec keith l.Moore), qui a reçu l’illustre prix J.C.B, en 1991.
douze... dont aucun ne s'est converti. Bizarre non ? http://answering-islam.org.uk/Quran/Science/embryo.htmlIt seems that not even Prof. Moore is sufficiently convinced by the scientific "facts" in the Qur'an to risk his reputation as a highly respected professor of anatomy in the medical establishment. The Islamic edition of his textbook is not available even in the British Library or the US Library of Congress, let alone other medical libraries in Western countries [54], presumably because he is aware that not only do the Islamic contributions in it contradict known science, but they also contradict what he has written in the standard version of his textbook. And ironically in the bibliography for the first chapter, "A history of embryology", in both the standard and Islamic versions he refers to Needham's important work on the history of embryology [55]. Needham however is unimpressed with the Arabic claims of embryology and after writing almost 60 pages about ancient Greek, Indian and Egyptian embryology he dismisses the entire Arabic tradition in less than one page, concluding that "Arabic science, so justly famed for its successes in certain fields such as optics and astronomy, was not of great help to embryology". After listing some of the verses in the Qur'an about embryology he dismisses them as merely "a seventh-century echo of Aristotle and the Ayer-veda" [56], in other words a mixture of Greek and ancient Indian teachings. In the most recent (1998) edition of The Developing Human, Moore also directs his readers to a book which contains another essay by Basim Musallam, which again points out how similar the Qur'anic science of embryology was to that of Galen, and how this close association was never questioned by the ancient Muslim scholars [57].
In conclusion then there is not a single statement contained in the Qur'an relating to modern embryology that was not well known through direct observation by the ancient Greek and Indian physicians many centuries before the Qur'an was written. Morever, much of what the Qur'an actually does say about embryology is scientifically inaccurate. The ancient physicians' works were translated into Syriac in the century preceeding Muhammed, and were therefore accessible to non-Greek speakers. We know that one of the Companions of the Prophet was a doctor who trained at the very same medical school that the Greek translations were kept and taught at. We even know that at least one of the verses which describes embryology, sura 23:14 contains the words of another of Muhammed's companions. We are forced to conclude that, far from proving the alleged divine credentials of the Qur'an, its embryological statements actually provide further convincing evidence for its human origins.
De plus on en est a la 7è edition
toujours avec nos deux compères co-auteurs....Moore, K., Persaud, T., The Developing Human, 7th edition, 2003, W. B. Saunders
Bizarrement c'est la version 3è qui est toujours citée...
et sur l'édition il est indique:Moore, Keith L. and Azzindani, Abdul Majeed A.: The Developing Human. Clinically Oriented Embryology with ISLAMIC ADDITIONS. 3rd Ed., Dar Al-Qiblah and W.B. Saunders
ISBN: 0721664925
Author: Keith L. Moore
Publisher: Abul Qasim Publishing House (Saudi Arabia)
Pages: 479 Binding: Hardback
Vous pouvez lire avec intéret aussi ceci:
http://www.geocities.com/freethoughtmecca/embryo.html
